Council of the Judiciary: Together for Change summons Cristina Kirchner and Sergio Massa to comply with the Court's ruling

This Wednesday they will send notes to the presidents of both legislative chambers asking them to appoint the fourth representative in the body

Together for Change https://www.reusealways.com/read-blog/106207_livepros-capsulas-para-que-sirve.html decided to redouble the bet and will ask Cristina Kirchner and Sergio Massa this Wednesday to appoint a senator https://socialrus.com/story10087294/livepros-capsulas-para-que-sirve and a deputy from the main opposition coalition as members of the Judicial Council and thus comply with the Court's https://www.xaphyr.com/blogs/94956/Livepros-Capsulas-para-que-sirve ruling Supreme Court that declared unconstitutional the current organization that selects and punishes judges.

The decision was made https://catbuzzy.com/read-blog/80285_livepros-capsulas-para-que-sirve.html after the precautionary measure adopted by a federal court in Paraná became known, at the request of the pro-government deputy Marcelo https://jav.social/declanfranklin Casaretto (Entre Ríos), who ordered the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies to refrain from appointing new members in the Judicial Council.

As anticipated by LA NACION , https://www.kemovebbs.com/User-declanfranklin the main opposition coalition decided to demand that the authorities of both parliamentary chambers comply with the https://murl.com/2vLwM decision of the highest court, which in December declared the current composition of 13 members of the Judicial Council unconstitutional https://www.evernote.com/shard/s620/sh/7fcd6575-1631-c13d-c7cb-d27891ec18c4/fb86dd613ae4fbdc43db28e22531333c and summoned Congress to sanction within a period of 120 days, which expires this Friday, a new law that regulates its operation.

In its decision, the court https://trello.com/b/QNQjxo1w/livepros-capsulas-para-que-sirve established that, if there is no new rule after the deadline, the body must return to the 20-member composition it had between 1998 https://automatic-horn-02b.notion.site/Livepros-Capsulas-Powerful-prostatitis-capsules-with-long-lasting-results-5da76faebead42109980219196da3af2 and 2006. The decision of Together for Change was adopted this Tuesday afternoon in a meeting held by the presidents of the UCR blocks https://app.simplenote.com/p/S3qBzk of both chambers, Mario Negri (Deputies) and Luis Naidenoff (Senate), and the leader of Pro in the Senate , the missionary Humberto Schiavoni.

According to opposition https://app.zooppa.com/users/hunterandersons legislative sources, the proposals to join the Judicial Council will be Deputy Roxana Reyes (UCR-Santa Cruz) and https://www.digi.com/support/forum/82054/livepros-capsulas-para-que-sirve Senator Luis Juez (Pro-Córdoba). Under the 1997 law, each chamber nominated four representatives to the Judicial http://livepros-capsulas-para-que-sirve.bravesites.com/ Council. That representation was reduced to three for each wing of the Legislative Power by the rule passed in 2006, which was drafted https://folkd.com/user/hunterandersons and promoted by Cristina Kirchner when she was a senator and first lady. This law is the one that the Court declared unconstitutional.

That fourth representative http://www.authorstream.com/hunterandersons/ by Chamber was destined for the second minority, or third in the event that no political bloc had a majority. For this https://livepros-capsulas-paraquesirve.simplesite.com/ reason, Together for Change considers that these seats correspond to radicalism in the Deputies and to https://www.kongregate.com/accounts/hunterandersons the Pro in the Senate. Kirchnerism has already announced that it is not willing to abide by the Court's ruling, which https://creativemarket.com/users/hunterandersons it considers a legal aberration. This was stated by Senator Oscar Parrilli (Neuquén), who in dialogue with LA NACION https://www.businesslistings.net.au/Prostatitis_Care/Mexico_City/Livepros_Capsulas_para_que_sirve/721268.aspx described the decision of the highest court as "crazy" and an "institutional blow" against the Council of the Judiciary.